You are currently browsing the The English Guy's Personal Blog weblog archives for the year 2012.

 

Posted by richard

This is something I’ve come up with, feel free to alter as you please. Since I’ve had a bad cold, I thought I’d try to make some chicken soup, which I’ve never done before. I’d cooked a roast chicken the other day and thought I could use the carcass, which is perfect for this apparently.

The ingredients I used:

  • 1 Chicken carcass
  • 1 Leek, roughly chopped
  • 1 Onion, roughly chopped
  • 3 pints water
  • 1 Chicken Stock Cube
  • 1 Finely chopped sprig of parsley
  • Salt

Put the water, carcass, and stock cube in a pan, cover, and simmer for two hours.

When ready, strain out the chicken carcass (or pick out with a spoon, which I did) and strip off remaining chicken flesh. The remaining liquid, onion and leek, blend briefly.

Add the chicken back to the blended liquid, add a pinch of salt and some finely chopped parsley. Voila.

Afterthoughts: I know many chicken soups have carrots and potatoes in, but I’m trying to avoid eating potatoes, and didn’t have carrots! So thankfully this came out quite well, wasn’t too bad on the tastiness front, so I thought I’d share it with you. More importantly it lets you get another meal or two from a chicken carcass…

 

Posted by richard

British weather forecasting did well again tonight.

Yesterday it said on the BBC weather site, and the Met site, there was the possibility of a few snow flurries in the evening and overnight.

It’s been snowing for four hours solid now. Snowing. Not ‘flurries’ by anyone’s imagination… Cars are buried outside, the road is covered over thickly and it’s still coming down strong.

 

Posted by richard

I use Google for searching, mostly because I find their results accurate and (most of the time) spam-free.

Lately however I’ve been experimenting more with Bing and Yahoo. They seem to be the same. So much so that they have the same results for the search terms I’m using, in the same positions. Makes me wonder…

Anyway, on to my point. Bing, your search results are awful. I select ‘Results only from the UK’ and here’s a slice of what I get, for the search term ‘school signage‘:

  • Position 10: they can’t even spell the word ‘signage’ properly (they spelt it ‘sinage’), yet you have them at position 10? They’re also position 21, apparently duplicating content, you allow that do you?
  • Position 42: is a PDF file leading to an article. Surely when searching the web, I’m looking for websites?
  • Position 63: Nothing to do with school signage.
  • Position 72: Nothing to do with school signage.
  • Position 82: Nothing to do with school signage. The title even says so!
  • Position 95: Nothing to do with school signage.

Ok so this is the first 100 results out of 19,000. Admittedly no-one looks past the first three pages (if that!).

So my reasoning for this was because I was looking for the company I work for, , for their results under the same search term. Limiting this a little to ‘school signage lincolnshire‘, again on Bing, here goes:

  • Position 12: Finally! We’re on there, but oddly not the GRS category for school signs, why is that Bing?
  • Position 13: Lincolnshire tree services? Are you serious Bing? And again at position 20?
  • Position 25, 26, 30: Council web pages?
  • Position 29: A school?

Ok so why is this happening? Surely a simple search term like ‘school signage‘ should net me only those websites and webpages that deal with ‘school signage‘? Out of the 16,400 results above, the first 30 have at least 5 bogus (maybe bogus isn’t a good word, let’s say ‘inaccurate’) results…

I read that Bing (and Yahoo) both set their store by how many incoming links a website has, to grade and position them in results. How is that useful? That’s easily manipulatable by scammers, and companies as large as yours should know that. How easy would it be to create an innocent page on say, breakfast cereal, get hundreds if not thousands of incoming links, let it sit for a month or two, then swap the content out for mobile telephone offers, or worse, porn?

My family’s business chooses not to have outgoing and incoming links to competitors, or related businesses, because we want to stand alone on the product we produce. There is nothing wrong with that. Google seems to agree, our links are fairly high on their searches, but not on yours (and Yahoo’s).

Can someone please clarify a little? How can I structure the website to better gain rank on their search listings? It is well written HTML/CSS/PHP/JQuery, I try to follow all the rules, but because we don’t want to clutter our business pages with incoming links, we’re penalised?

 

Posted by richard

Unbelievably I have had yet another flat tyre on my bike!

That makes something like 5 times now in the space of a couple of years. No-one else who uses a bike at work gets them! WTF is with my bike? I need a super armoured tyre or something, or a kevlar lining to my current tyres.

 

Posted by richard

According to Einstein:

E = mc2

As many documentaries tell us, as you approach the speed of light, you become heavier, until at the speed of light you are as heavy as the Universe. Thus, you cannot travel faster than light.

Except…

What about light itself? If this is the case, why aren’t photons unbelievably heavy?

 

Posted by richard

I was seriously thinking about upgrading my computer that I work on. And of course, given that I read voraciously, I am all agog about solid state drives, or at least I keep telling myself that. (Ooh yeah I want one of those, you know what I mean)

The past few years have been an era of expanding hard drives (now you can get 3TB drives!), but the solid state drives, despite what we have heard, are going a bit slower. I mean, you can get a 1TB SSD but the price is a bit high (£1622).

I think I’ll wait.

Of course, I could wait for the flying cars they promised up forty years ago…