Browsing the politics category...

 

Posted by richard

After having endured two years of his “rule”, Labour insiders are finally starting to gather to bury Mr. Brown. He is an unelected leader, a tyrant in sheep’s clothing, it’s about time someone stood up to this woeful primacy.

To those that may not know us Brits, we apparently have an enlightened system where we vote a party into office, not a person. So collectively, the politically correct idiots of Labour have had nearly thirteen years of rule. It has not been pretty.

It seems un-British to have a system where we can’t vote for our leader. Moreover, when Blair was forced out, only Labour MPs got to vote on his replacement. Frankly, I think we should vote for a leader and a deputy. If the first goes, the second takes over and if the second goes, we have a general election, that seems fair.

Mr. Brown is not elected, except as an MP. This needs to stop now, even this close to an election (one has to be called before June). As the NY Times writes so succinctly:

In a radio interview, Ms. Hewitt, a former health secretary, declared: “This is not an attempted coup. It’s exactly what we say in the letter — it’s an attempt to get this matter sorted out once and for all.”

Precisely, it needs sorting out, as do our election and leadership laws.

Tags: ,

 

Posted by richard

All this hullabaloo about the execution of a convicted heroin smuggler. The fact is, he was found with 4 kg of heroin in a bag. Thus, a drug smuggler. China has severe laws regarding drug smuggling and frankly, I think we should too.

Everyone falls back on this “mental disability” nonsense when they’re going to be convicted of something, like this, or when being extradited, in the case of Gary McKinnon. What I’d like to know is, did Akmal Shaikh seek help before going to China to become a pop star (who on earth, at the age of 53, goes to a foreign country to become a pop star?!)? Did Gary McKinnon do that, before hacking into US computer systems?

The British Government needs to drop this and stop interfering with another country’s legal system. Certainly, the family could lodge appeals, but it’s not the Government’s place when the man has been found guilty, to intercede. Simply because we don’t have capital punishment for such crimes (it still exists here for treason, piracy), is not a good reason to wave the flag in front of China and whine like little girls.

To go into another country and to expect to be treated leniently when committing crimes, is lunacy.

Tags:

 

Posted by richard

The UK has now made GBL a Class C drug. This, after a student named Hester Stewart died after having taken it. It was legal, and because she died, or at least contributing to it, it is now illegal.

Questions arise though. GBL is a solvent – what about those products that use GBL in them? Inks in industrial printers, they use GBL in significant quantities, are they to be changed to another solvent because of this? Are we to throw away those products that we have that contain it?

Also, why doesn’t the government put alcohol and tobacco into the same categories? Many MANY more die because of them each year, but they’re still legal. Doesn’t make sense does it?

Tags: ,

 

Posted by richard

I have come to realise that the Labour government (I don’t say ‘my government’, please notice) only listens to advsiors when they say something they want to hear.

The reason I say this is because this morning we have Copenhagen conference starting, and Ed Miliband was on TV talking about his advisors telling him about climate change. Yet, when a well-respected professor talks about drugs (Professor Nutt) and that they should be reclassified, the government fires him.

While it may be difficult for people to believe that some drugs are not as bad as the government want us to believe, most of us believe in climate change (I’m not saying it doesn’t exist). Perhaps this is the reason, after all lots of money can be made from climate change technologies, relatively little can be made by restricting alcohol and permitting drugs such as ecstacy or marijuana.

Tags: , ,

 

Posted by richard

It’s a sad sign of the times that when a convicted murderer, Jane Andrews, (who was in an ‘Open’ prison, what idiot put her there?) absconds and the government fears for her safety. HER safety? A convicted murderer on the loose and you fear for her? Surely they mean they fear for our safety and are trying their hardest to find her…

This age of political correctness must end.

Tags:

 

Posted by richard

Insanity. That’s what I would call our government’s attitude to drugs.

I don’t necessarily mean drugs like cocaine, heroin, and those class A drugs you go to prison for. I mean the drugs like alcohol, which causes approximately 20,000 deaths a year directly or indirectly in the UK. I cite evidence of that in this MSNBC article – they say 75,000 a year in 2005, and I scale that down for our population figures. Here in the UK alcohol is FAR cheaper than in the US, easier to buy, you can buy it at 18 too.

I also mean our government’s, and other governments’ attitudes, to tobacco. Stunningly, nearly half a million a year die from tobacco in the US. So for us in the UK that would be about 100,000 to 125,000 – a really huge figure when you think about it.

And our government fires experts who say that ecstacy, marijuana, and other illegal drugs, are less lethal than alcohol. Why can’t we properly manage these drugs in our society? Why is marijuana illegal when it causes no deaths? Or perhaps the government works on the ‘Apathy kills’ approach, people on marijuana do tend to be apathetic after all.

Professor Nutt has fallen foul of our spineless government. Kudos to him for his courage, sympathy for him for his treatment.

 

Posted by richard

…especially when the UN watchdog looking at vote-rigging in Afghanistan has thrown out thousands, and looks more and more like the President Karzai may face a run-off vote.

I don’t trust the man, even more so now. He doesn’t want to accept the watchdog’s announcement, so our troops are now fighting for us, in a country run by a tyrant. Why are they there? Who cares about Afghanistan?

I know that sounds callous but really, what are we there for? Stopping the Taleban? It wasn’t the Taleban who bombed the towers. They kept the heroin production down, it’s more than three times as much now, so we or the Afghanis are doing a piss-poor job of that. I’m sorry that they treat women badly, but that happens all over the muslim world, they all treat their women like chattel.

Come on, let’s get our boys out of there.

Tags: , ,

 

Posted by richard

The latest drive from the government is to reduce the amount of trash we put in landfill, from 57% per year to 25%. Now, it’s a good idea. We -should- be trying our hardest to recycle, that’s for certain.

We here in Louth, in East Lindsey, do recycle a lot. I know that my neighbours all put their bins out, pretty full. And, it’s not hard to get it done, it’s not hard to separate plastics and paper into another bin. So that’s fine. What’s not fine is seeing that some districts lately have been photographed stuffing their recycling rubbish with the normal rubbish, so this really isn’t a matter for us citizens to sort out, but the district councils that run our daily lives.

So what else can we do? Well I re-use my plastic bags as bin bags. I don’t buy pre-made food so that cuts down a lot on plastic packaging materials – that might be hard for some people who don’t cook from fresh ingredients.

Back to the title, is it possible for us to change how much we put in landfill? Maybe yes if we do proper recycling of plastics, and I mean -all- plastics. Recycle metal/white goods, computers, washing machines and so on. Metal can be recycled, so I think in the end, 25% of our rubbish going into a landfill site is doable.

Tags:

 

Posted by richard

Our unelected leader, Gordon Brown, tyrant in all but name, has been giving his speech to his cronies.

He has used the speech to bandstand new policies that wants to get going. One of them is appealing, curtailing the anti-social behaviour of some families, especially poignant given the suicide of that lady (Fiona Pilkington) and her kid that’s been in the news lately. Interesting idea but really, getting rid of police paperwork and getting police on the street might be better.

Also, he’s really pushing the national ID card system and while I don’t have an issue with it, -WE- have to pay upfront for it and if it’s compulsory that simply isn’t fair to force people to pay £100. Not to mention that examples have been ridiculously easy to hack.

He admitted that he’s going to have a hard time getting re-elected though, and for once I think he’s actually seen the light. Yes Gordon, you probably won’t be sitting on the same side of Parliament in a few months time. Thank God. No wonder President Obama gave you the cold shoulder, he knows your probable future!

Tags: , ,

 

Posted by richard

Labour has traditionally been one of those parties that is utterly socialist. People have always considered them err, let me put it delicately, nearly communist. But now they are digging into the middle class’ pockets to pay for the rash business actions of the rich bankers.

They are now considering removing benefits.

At work we have these conversations about how those with a family have an advantage over those of us who are single and have no kids. They get benefits, they get tax breaks and so on. Which is true, they do. And from a single person’s view it doesn’t seem fair. After all, if you want kids, that you’re decision and more importantly, your burden to bear. We, who are single or don’t have children, shouldn’t have to pay our taxes to pay for your kids. That seems fair doesn’t it?

Labour though, wants to see about these child benefits and pensioner’s winter fuel payments. That really does appear to be a bit unfair. Why not tax the rich? Those making above say, £100,000, make them pay a higher tax bracket perhaps at 50%?

If they are looking at child benefits and winter fuel payments, aren’t they affecting the lowest levels of society, those they traditionally defend above all others?

Tags: , ,