Browsing the work category...

 

Posted by richard

I use Google for searching, mostly because I find their results accurate and (most of the time) spam-free.

Lately however I’ve been experimenting more with Bing and Yahoo. They seem to be the same. So much so that they have the same results for the search terms I’m using, in the same positions. Makes me wonder…

Anyway, on to my point. Bing, your search results are awful. I select ‘Results only from the UK’ and here’s a slice of what I get, for the search term ‘school signage‘:

  • Position 10: they can’t even spell the word ‘signage’ properly (they spelt it ‘sinage’), yet you have them at position 10? They’re also position 21, apparently duplicating content, you allow that do you?
  • Position 42: is a PDF file leading to an article. Surely when searching the web, I’m looking for websites?
  • Position 63: Nothing to do with school signage.
  • Position 72: Nothing to do with school signage.
  • Position 82: Nothing to do with school signage. The title even says so!
  • Position 95: Nothing to do with school signage.

Ok so this is the first 100 results out of 19,000. Admittedly no-one looks past the first three pages (if that!).

So my reasoning for this was because I was looking for the company I work for, , for their results under the same search term. Limiting this a little to ‘school signage lincolnshire‘, again on Bing, here goes:

  • Position 12: Finally! We’re on there, but oddly not the GRS category for school signs, why is that Bing?
  • Position 13: Lincolnshire tree services? Are you serious Bing? And again at position 20?
  • Position 25, 26, 30: Council web pages?
  • Position 29: A school?

Ok so why is this happening? Surely a simple search term like ‘school signage‘ should net me only those websites and webpages that deal with ‘school signage‘? Out of the 16,400 results above, the first 30 have at least 5 bogus (maybe bogus isn’t a good word, let’s say ‘inaccurate’) results…

I read that Bing (and Yahoo) both set their store by how many incoming links a website has, to grade and position them in results. How is that useful? That’s easily manipulatable by scammers, and companies as large as yours should know that. How easy would it be to create an innocent page on say, breakfast cereal, get hundreds if not thousands of incoming links, let it sit for a month or two, then swap the content out for mobile telephone offers, or worse, porn?

My family’s business chooses not to have outgoing and incoming links to competitors, or related businesses, because we want to stand alone on the product we produce. There is nothing wrong with that. Google seems to agree, our links are fairly high on their searches, but not on yours (and Yahoo’s).

Can someone please clarify a little? How can I structure the website to better gain rank on their search listings? It is well written HTML/CSS/PHP/JQuery, I try to follow all the rules, but because we don’t want to clutter our business pages with incoming links, we’re penalised?

 

Posted by richard

I have a site I’ve worked on for years, GRS Sign Company, it’s owned by my family so I have a vested interest to work hard on it. I follow many if not all of the generally gathered advice about SEO/SEM, and I have to say, get generally good results.

But what irritates me to no end is Yahoo and Bing. They don’t notice the site, or barely do so. One of the major pieces of advice especially for Bing is, add quality content, consistently. Interesting, given that GRS updates their site every week with new photos of their work, we write about the work, use keywords efficiently but not overly so. Yet, in search results in Bing, we’re never found. Odd don’t you think?

The same thing happens with Yahoo.

Now, one of the ‘advice’ sites I’ve read up on says that Yahoo and Bing like proper use of meta tags. Ok, interesting. So let’s search for ‘corporate signage’ on Bing and this site, www.modelsignage.co.uk, appears No. 1. Just take a look at the <head> section for that. The only meta tag is for http-equiv. The document is relatively old, written in html 4.01 Transitional and it’s table-based layout! Clearly Bing has put a cutting edge site right at the top of 11,500,000 results…

 

Posted by richard

So looking through search engine terms for the main GRS work site today I came across this anomaly. It makes me question the search engines’ criteria. Actually most of my questions were for Bing, but this one is for Yahoo.

Search for ‘polished acrylic signs’ and no.1 is this site’s page, no.2 is this GRS page. What makes me a little peeved?

  • No.1′s site doesn’t have the search term in the url;
  • No.1′s site only shows one image;
  • No.1′s page does not link directly to other related sign pages;
  • No.1′s site is table-based layout!;
  • No.1′s page only mentions the search term once;
  • No.1′s page doesn’t even mention the search term in the keywords or description;
  • No.1′s page isn’t updatable in terms of allowing customers to comment;

So why is No.1′s page No.1?

How very annoying, especially for website developers who try hard to get their sites to the top, using white hat techniques, only to find that standard and well-tested techniques (that the search engines themselves espouse!) don’t work or are ignored by them!

Tags: ,

 

Posted by richard

Today was a day I needed something in Illustrator, and it was just not there.

In FlexiSign, which we used to use at GRS, you could program it to create a print that would increment numbers. So, twenty signs with a bit of text somewhere saying ’1′, and the next would have ’2′, ad nauseum.

I had a bit of work today to create text from 15000 to 20000, not something you can just program in easily. Nor I might add, in a day! I figured a few minutes searching for whether Illustrator can do it or not might save hours later on. Disappointment follows, Illustrator can’t do that! No time saved.

:(

 

Posted by richard

How very bloody annoying! I actually want to work, to get cracking on one of the jobs I have, and after setting up the domain on the dreamhost server, it suddenly goes dead. I can’t get into to the management panel, thus I can’t do anything.

Painful. Especially since I was all geared up to doing some work. C’est la vie.

Tags: ,

 

Posted by richard

I, like many developers and designers out there, am so damned tired of IE6.

Can’t people move on and get themselves a decent modern browser? It is literally a click away. Opera and FireFox are so easy to install and get running, I installed Opera on a machine the other day and it was as simple as one click to download and one or two to install.

IE6‘s problems with css cause so many headaches, it’s a real ball ache.

Tags: ,

 

Posted by richard

Well I did it, I nearly buggered up Windows 7, or my install of it at least.

On my Windows XP install I had a multiple-IE program installed so I could look at web pages in past versions. I installed it on the Windows 7 install, wouldn’t work so I removed it.

This morning I rebooted, then tried to access things like, My Computer, Control Panel etc and I got an error – No such interface. Uh oh. I searched around and there were these long winded processes, but one guy just simply said, let Windows 7 repair it. I thought, hmm, ok I’ll try it.

Whaddya know, the Microsoft boys did a really good job on this OS. It repaired it, fixed issues no problem, here we are all shiny and brand new. Windows 7 really is a good package, far better than any other OS they’ve produced.

Tags: ,

 

Posted by richard

Had a good mini presentation on my OpenAir Drupal theme just now.

This was basically a quick talk on the work I did porting the OpenAir WordPress theme to Drupal. Although this was my first theme with Drupal I think that I will be doing others, it’s a good system, easy to work with, and lots of resources (with ever-more coming online).

Thanks to Yuetsu for asking me, much appreciated.

Tags: , , , ,

 

Posted by richard

Several months ago I was approached to port one of my WordPress themes () to Drupal. Bear in mind I’d never played with Drupal whatsoever, but I said yes just to get some experience. It worked well, although there are some things that can’t be done, with my level of knowledge at this point, at least. I imagine I’ll learn more soon and catch up.

So this weekend, I was asked to give a chat on Skype on how I ported the WP theme to Drupal, so it will be this Saturday afternoon sometime. The Drupal camp is in Portland Oregon I believe. Should be interesting.

Getting in the spirit of things, I’m going to be porting another one of my WP themes to Drupal tomorrow to get ready for this, going over some of the things I’ve done so I know what I’m talking about. I’m thinking a fairly easy theme, like , or .

Tags: , ,

 

Posted by richard

I think that after many years of working on web sites, development and so on, I’m fairly used to lots of scams like people adding you on msn just to hawk their wares, video chat and so on.

But yesterday I had some Indian guy on Skype add me, and then start pestering me. He was well pushy, asking me what I was doing, several times, then started on asking me about ‘procedures’. I eventually got what he was trying to say, in his bad english, that he wanted to work on code for me, for outsourcing.

It was a bit out of the blue to say the least, and a bit inappropriate for Skype. He got blocked, but I dare say more will pop up.

Tags: